My daughter,husband,and three young sons rented a house at Nth Richmond.She made it very clear to the agent that she required a long occupancy,this was agreed to.The owner then decided to attempt to subdivide the property,despite considerable resistance from the neighbours.This required removal of a section of the existing house,so to allow for this, immediately the initial six months lease expired she was served notice to vacate,despite the aforementioned occupancy agreement.This notice arrived a few weeks before Christmas and was due to take effect on the first day of school for her eldest son.Although this complied with the statutory requirements it was completely immoral and shows the complete lack of any meaningful protection for a tenant that had done all the right things.